Page 23                                              Spring 1994

JW: Is everyone capable of the self-exploration you advocate? Can it be learned, and can it be taught.

MM: I think it's a matter of choice. If you're going to do work that's more creative there are costs to that. Whatever people focus on is what grows. Not many people choose self-exploration because, at a juggling convention, people get so fascinated with the stuff they see that they de­cide to do that. It becomes about learning these things that everyone else does instead of self-exploration.

 

There's a strong attraction to take the shortcut, to say, "That's pretty and interesting and I'm going to work on that because I already know it works." But what you're doing is climbing a mountain by putting all your hardware into bolts that someone else set. You're not climbing the mountain in a way that says anything about you. There aren't many people who can do like Neil Stammer and decide that they have to stop hanging out with jugglers if they're going to be any good. Neil just went away for a long time.

 

JW: Did you see that happening and decide you weren't going to do it?

MM: I tried to. You have to fight the tendency to take shortcuts and not learn something you already know works. You have to take risks if you're going to do something you can ultimately feel really good about. I think everyone feels the urge to take the easy way, but the easy way isn't always ultimately the best way to go. The longer the path, the more interesting the work is to watch when it's finally in front of people.

 

JW: What do you get out of IJA festivals then?

MM: It's weird. There's so much politics going on, but ultimately that gets put aside and it's about juggling being part of a larger framework. In Fargo the high point for me was watching the public show. The acts made it clear that it was about more than juggling, that juggling was just the tip of the iceberg. It was such a great show, and then Airjazz wrapped it all up with pole piece. I enjoy being around the field and staying in touch with people I've met over the years. It really is a place where creative people meet and show good work.

 

JW: How did it all get started for you? Do you remember learning to juggle three balls?

MM: I remember practicing over my bed as a freshman in high school in Mendham, N.J. I was into lacrosse balls and didn't know why anyone wanted to juggle those big clubs. I also did a lot of work with theatre, and studied dance the couple of years later when I was at the University of Utah. I then transferred to New York University and saw the Foolsfire Show with Bob Berkey, Fred Garbo and Michael Moschen. I told myself then and there I wanted to take a workshop with those guys. I got my chance at their Antic Arts Academy at SUNY-Purchase when the IJA festival was there in 1983. It was a heck of a way to start! I remember doing my three ball routine at that workshop, and I worked with another performer do­ing experimental stuff in Toronto in mixed media, slides and electronic music. I did that for a couple of years.

 

JW: Before you moved to Maine, didn't you produce some shows in New Jersey?

MM: It was the New Vaudeville Cabaret in Watchung, N.J., an hour outside of Manhattan. That ran a little over two years as a monthly variety show. I was the emcee, executive producer and driving force behind the whole thing. The idea was an experiment to try to develop work and tJ;1en develop it into a bigger show. I learned a great deal from it, and worked with a lot of people. Some of them were great and some were hard to work with, so I got to see what things were like from a producer's point of view. I got to see why some people succeeded, and why others weren't ever going to go anywhere. During that time I was supported by two State of New Jersey Fellowship Grants.

 

We would pretty much fill up the theatre every month, but that would only carry us to the next month. It was basically a labor of love.

 

JW: Are you ever going to issue a compilation of your work on video, or try to do more TV work?

MM: I'm working on a couple of different video projects, but mainly right now just to know what works and what doesn't.

 

I don't have any aspirations to commercial TV that I know of, and I'm certainly not interested in doing cable comedy shows. They're all the same, just a bunch of guys standing in front of a brick wall performing to a bunch of people who are supposed to be having drinks or something. The format isn't that interesting.

 

The reason I want to get into video is to be the director, to have real control of it, rather than being exposed in a way that it's someone else's idea. Ideally I want to be my own creator and producer. I've been working towards it for two or three years and have other people working on it with me. Now I have 90 minutes or 2 hours of Michael Menes on tape, but I'm not interested in selling it yet because I want the music to be original and legal.

 

When you sit down and watch TV about 80% of it is really bad because the people who do it have run out of ideas. It's a shame because there are people out there with more interesting stuff, but they don't have the production skills. With that in mind, I'm working towards setting up my own video system. A couple of companies are doing totally digital video now, and I'm very interested in owning that kind of desktop system once the price comes down some. You'll still have to get good equipment and good people to set up a professional shoot, but you can do all the post-production yourself.

 

While I don't know at this point if I'm specifically interested in doing a TV show, I do know I want to preserve my work on film. Performing on the road requires a lot of travel and trouble and then the work is done and gone. But once you have it on film it's always there. We filmed the show in Lancaster and are editing that now.

 

I realize TV is a very powerful medium, and 10 years from now with the informa­tion highway and 500 channel universe, it will be very much different. I think special interest groups, like jugglers, will very much gain from that. With desktop production, more and more people can be producers and there will be a tremendous proliferation of programs. You'll be able to tune into your own program because it will be a small part of a huge offering of products.

<--- Previous Page

Return to Main Index

Next Page --->