Page 23 Spring 1994
JW:
Is everyone capable of the self-exploration you advocate? Can it
be learned, and can it be taught. MM:
I think it's a matter of choice. If you're going to do work
that's more creative there are costs to that. Whatever people focus
on is what grows. Not many people choose self-exploration because,
at a juggling convention, people get so fascinated with the stuff
they see that they decide to do that. It becomes about learning
these things that everyone else does instead of self-exploration.
There's
a strong attraction to take the shortcut, to say, "That's
pretty and interesting and I'm going to work on that because I
already know it works." But what you're doing is climbing a
mountain by putting all your hardware into bolts that someone else
set. You're not climbing the mountain in a way that says anything
about you. There aren't many people who can do like Neil Stammer and
decide that they have to stop hanging out with jugglers if they're
going to be any good. Neil just went away for a long time.
JW:
Did you see that happening and decide you weren't going
to do it? MM:
I tried to. You have to fight the tendency to take shortcuts and not
learn something you already know works. You have to take risks if
you're going to do something you can ultimately feel really good
about. I think everyone feels the urge to take the easy way, but the
easy way isn't always ultimately the best way to go. The longer the
path, the more interesting the work is to watch when it's finally in
front of people.
JW:
What do you get out of IJA festivals then? MM:
It's weird. There's so much politics going on, but ultimately that
gets put aside and it's about juggling being part of a larger
JW:
How did it all get started for you? Do you remember
learning to juggle three balls? MM:
I remember practicing over my bed as a freshman in high school in
Mendham, N.J. I was into lacrosse balls and didn't know why anyone
wanted to juggle those big clubs. I also did a lot of work with
theatre, and studied dance the couple of years later when I was at
the University of Utah. I then transferred to New York University
and saw the Foolsfire Show with Bob Berkey, Fred Garbo and Michael
Moschen. I told myself then and there I wanted to take a workshop
with those guys. I got my chance at their Antic Arts Academy at SUNY-Purchase
when the IJA festival was there in 1983. It was a heck of a way to
start! I remember doing my three ball routine at that workshop, and
I worked with another performer doing experimental stuff in
Toronto in mixed media, slides and electronic music. I did that for
a couple of years.
JW:
Before you moved to Maine, didn't you produce some shows in
New Jersey? MM:
It was the New Vaudeville Cabaret in Watchung, N.J., an hour outside
of Manhattan. That ran a little over two years as a monthly variety
show. I was the emcee, executive producer and driving force behind
the whole thing. The idea was an experiment to try to develop work
and tJ;1en develop it into a bigger show. I learned a great deal
from it, and worked with a lot of people. Some of them were great
and some were hard to work with, so I got to see what things were
like from a producer's point of view. I got to see why some people
succeeded, and why others weren't ever going to go anywhere. During
that time I was supported by two State of New Jersey Fellowship
Grants.
We
would pretty much fill up the theatre every month, but that would only
carry us to the next month. It was basically a labor of love.
JW: Are you ever going to issue a compilation of your work on video, or try to do more TV work? MM:
I'm working on a couple of different video projects, but mainly right
now just to know what works and what doesn't.
I
don't have any aspirations to commercial TV that I know of, and I'm
certainly not interested in doing cable comedy shows. They're all the
same, just a bunch of guys standing in front of a brick wall
performing to a bunch of people who are supposed to be having drinks
or something. The format isn't that interesting.
The
reason I want to get into video is to be the director, to have real
control of it, rather than being exposed in a way that it's someone
else's idea. Ideally I want to be my own creator and producer. I've
been working towards it for two or three years and have other people
working on it with me. Now I have 90 minutes or 2 hours of Michael
Menes on tape, but I'm not interested in selling it yet because I want
the music to be original and legal.
When
you sit down and watch TV about 80% of it is really bad because the
people who do it have run out of ideas. It's a shame because there are
people out there with more interesting stuff, but they don't have the
production skills. With that in mind, I'm working towards setting up
my own video system. A couple of companies are doing totally digital
video now, and I'm very interested in owning that kind of desktop
system once the price comes down some. You'll still have to get good
equipment and good people to set up a professional shoot, but you can
do all the post-production yourself.
While
I don't know at this point if I'm specifically interested in doing a
TV show, I do know I want to preserve my work on film. Performing on
the road requires a lot of travel and trouble and then the work is
done and gone. But once you have it on film it's always there. We
filmed the show in Lancaster and are editing that now.
I realize TV is a very powerful medium, and 10 years from now with the information highway and 500 channel universe, it will be very much different. I think special interest groups, like jugglers, will very much gain from that. With desktop production, more and more people can be producers and there will be a tremendous proliferation of programs. You'll be able to tune into your own program because it will be a small part of a huge offering of products. |